Safety

Hazardous area repair without hot work: cold repair in ATEX zones and Canadian hazardous locations

Hicham M, P Eng, PMPUpdated 9 min read

Hazardous area repair without hot work means restoring a leaking or corroded component with ambient-curing epoxy or composite systems instead of welding, so no flame or arc enters the classified area. It cuts the permit, isolation and monitoring burden of hot work, but tools, static and solvents remain ignition sources to control.

What a hazardous area is: ATEX zones and Canadian classification

ATEX is the European framework for explosive atmospheres. It rests on two directives: 2014/34/EU for equipment and protective systems intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres, and 1999/92/EC for the protection of workers, which requires the employer to classify areas into zones. The zone definitions are shared with the IEC 60079 series:

Zone (gas, vapour, mist)Zone (combustible dust)Explosive atmosphere is present
Zone 0Zone 20Continuously, for long periods or frequently
Zone 1Zone 21Likely to occur occasionally in normal operation
Zone 2Zone 22Not likely in normal operation, and only for a short period if it does occur

In Canada, "ATEX" is not the regulatory term. Hazardous locations are dealt with in Section 18 of the Canadian Electrical Code, Part I (CSA C22.1), which uses the same zone logic: Zones 0, 1 and 2 for gases and vapours, and, in recent editions, Zones 20, 21 and 22 for combustible dusts. Many Canadian facilities, particularly older ones, are still documented under the class-and-division system (Class I, II or III; Division 1 or 2). Always work from the site's current area classification drawing, whichever system it uses. Plants with European owners or suppliers often use ATEX vocabulary in their internal standards as well.

Area classification is an electrical and process-safety document. It tells you where a flammable atmosphere can exist in normal operation; it does not tell you that the atmosphere around your work point is safe today. That is what the permit and gas testing are for. For how zone classification affects the design of mechanical parts, see our article on machined components for classified areas.

Why hot work in a classified area is so heavy to manage

Hot work (welding, cutting, grinding, torch work, anything producing a flame, an arc or hot sparks) is not banned outright in most plants. It is controlled, and in a classified area the controls add up quickly:

  • Hot work permit issued by the area authority, often with additional sign-offs for classified areas. Common references include NFPA 51B and CSA W117.2, applied through the site's own procedure.
  • Making the equipment gas-free: isolation, draining, depressurizing, blinding, then cleaning, steaming, purging or inerting depending on the fluid and the equipment.
  • Atmosphere testing before and during the work, with the lower explosive limit (LEL) threshold and test frequency set by the site.
  • Removal or protection of combustibles around the work point, and containment of sparks and spatter.
  • Fire watch during the work and for the period after it that the procedure requires.
  • Shutdown or production restrictions, because surrounding equipment often has to be taken out of service to make the area safe.

On a pipe or a tank that still holds product residue, gas-freeing alone can take longer than the repair itself. Welding may also trigger code obligations: qualified procedure, NDE, pressure test, sometimes heat treatment. That trade-off is the core of our cold bonding vs welding comparison.

What cold repair changes, and what it does not

A cold repair uses two-component materials, typically metal- or ceramic-filled epoxies, sometimes combined with a fibre-reinforced composite wrap, that cure by chemical reaction at ambient temperature. There is no flame, no arc and no molten metal. In many plants, that moves the job from a hot work permit to a cold work permit, a significant difference in preparation, cost and schedule.

Removing the flame does not make the job intrinsically safe. The remaining ignition and exposure hazards have to be identified in the risk analysis.

Surface preparation tools. Good adhesion requires a clean, rough surface, and most mechanical preparation methods can themselves generate sparks or hot surfaces: grinders, needle scalers, power wire brushes, impact on rusty steel. Abrasive blasting builds up static charge on the nozzle and hose, which must be grounded. So-called non-sparking tools (copper alloys) reduce the energy of mechanical sparks without eliminating the risk, and they wear faster than steel tools. The preparation method (hand tools, power tools, abrasive blasting or another technique) is chosen according to the risk analysis, the gas test results and the adhesion the repair requires. It is never improvised on the day.

Static electricity. Wiping with synthetic rags, pouring solvents, peeling films and handling plastic sheeting can all accumulate charge. Containers and equipment are bonded and grounded, and clothing and footwear follow the site's anti-static requirements.

Solvent vapours. Many repair epoxies are solvent-free, but cleaning agents and some primers or coatings are flammable. Their vapours add to the atmosphere you are measuring, which is why the products belong in the gas test plan, not just the equipment.

Safety data sheets. Every product brought into the area (resin, hardener, cleaner, primer) must have a current SDS, in WHMIS 2015 format in Canada. Section 2 gives the hazards, section 7 handling and storage, section 8 exposure controls and PPE, and section 9 the physical properties, including the flash point. Read them before the permit meeting, not at the work point.

Exposure. Epoxy resins and hardeners are recognized skin and respiratory sensitizers. Ventilation and PPE are part of the plan, especially in confined spaces such as tank interiors.

The cold repair procedure step by step

StepWhat it coversOutput
1. Assessment and risk analysisDefect, base metal, service conditions, zone, fluid; ignition sources of each taskEngineered repair design and job hazard analysis
2. Cold work permitAuthorization matched to the activity and the classification; isolation and lockout as requiredSigned permit, isolation record
3. Gas monitoringInitial test at the work point, then continuous or periodic monitoring as the permit requiresRecorded readings; stop-work criteria known to the crew
4. Surface preparationMethod selected in the risk analysis; cleanliness and profile checkedPrepared surface meeting the repair procedure
5. ApplicationMixing, application within pot life, reinforcement if the design calls for itRepair installed to the approved thickness and extent
6. CureCure time and temperature per the technical data sheet; protection from contaminationCure verified (hardness check, time and temperature records)
7. Return to serviceInspection, pressure or leak test if required, permit close-outEquipment released; repair entered in the inspection plan

Two points deserve emphasis. First, the repair design comes before the permit: pressure, temperature, defect type and design life determine whether a composite repair is acceptable at all. For pressure equipment and piping, that design logic is framed by ASME PCC-2 for composite repairs. Second, cure is part of the outage. Low temperatures slow the chemical reaction, and loading a repair before it has cured is one of the surest ways to make it fail.

Typical cold repairs in classified areas

  • Piping leaks and wall loss: external corrosion, pinholes and thinned areas repaired with epoxy filler and a composite wrap, within the limits of the engineered design.
  • Storage tanks: floor, shell and nozzle repairs in petroleum and chemical tank farms, integrated into the inspection framework of API 653 for composite tank repairs.
  • Pumps: casings, impellers and wear rings rebuilt after corrosion, erosion or cavitation, often in the shop but sometimes in place.
  • Flanges: pitted or corroded gasket seating surfaces rebuilt in place, as described in our guide to flange face corrosion repair without machining.

Limits of cold repair in hazardous areas

  • Service conditions: every product has temperature, pressure and chemical-resistance limits. They come from the technical data sheet and the product qualification, not from a general rule.
  • Structural and cracked components: cracks that can propagate, and primary load paths, usually call for a metallurgical repair.
  • Active leaks under pressure: sealing a live leak requires a system and a design specifically qualified for through-wall defects, plus a dedicated risk analysis.
  • Regulated pressure equipment: the repair must be accepted within the owner's inspection program and by the authority having jurisdiction.
  • Inspectability: a composite covers the substrate, so the repair needs a defined design life and a place in the inspection plan.
  • Cure conditions: surface temperature, dew point and humidity may rule out an outdoor winter repair without a heated enclosure, and heating equipment raises its own ignition questions in a classified area.

FAQ

Is cold repair allowed in Zone 1 or Division 1 areas? It can be, subject to the site's permit system. The zone does not prohibit a repair method; it describes the likelihood of a flammable atmosphere. The permit, gas testing and choice of tools are what make the job acceptable at a given time.

Does a cold repair need a hot work permit? Usually not, provided no task produces a flame, an arc or hot sparks. If the preparation involves grinding or other spark-producing tools, many sites treat that step as hot work. The permit follows the most hazardous task, not the name of the repair.

Are non-sparking tools enough to work in a flammable atmosphere? No. They reduce the energy of mechanical sparks but do not make work in a flammable atmosphere acceptable. The atmosphere must be measured and kept below the site's threshold, whatever tools are used.

Can equipment stay in service during a cold repair? Sometimes. External repairs on live piping and tanks are possible after an engineering and safety assessment. Whether the equipment must be isolated depends on the defect, the fluid and the repair design.

How long before the equipment can be returned to service? It depends on the product and the temperature. The cure schedule on the technical data sheet governs, together with any inspection or test required by the procedure.

Is ATEX mandatory in Canada? No. ATEX is European law. In Canada, hazardous locations fall under the Canadian Electrical Code and provincial requirements, although many sites use ATEX terms internally.

In practice

Induscoat carries out cold repairs of piping, tanks, pumps and flanges in classified areas in Quebec and Ontario through its maintenance and rehabilitation service, working under the client's permit system from the risk analysis to the cure check. The method is described on our cold bonding repair page. Send us the area classification, the fluid, the defect and the operating conditions to request a quote; if welding is the right answer, we will say so. Technical data sheets for the Induscoat range are published on the brand site, induscoat.com.

#ATEX#hazardous locations#hot work#cold repair#HSE
HM

Hicham M, P Eng, PMP

Engineer and project manager (PMP) at Induscoat. Over 16 years of experience in industrial coatings, composite repairs and wear protection on mining, energy and petrochemical sites in Canada and internationally.

Related articles

Comparison

Cold bonding vs welding: the cold bonding process, its limits, and when welding still wins

Cold bonding repairs metal with filled epoxy compounds and no heat input; welding restores metallurgical continuity but brings hot work, a heat-affected zone and code requirements. This guide walks through the cold bonding process step by step, compares both methods criterion by criterion, and sets out where each one is the wrong choice.

Hicham M, P Eng, PMP
10 min
Safety

Machined components for explosive atmospheres: what compliance actually requires

"I need this part in ATEX." The request arrives exactly like that, and on its own it means nothing. A mechanical part is not ATEX-certified the way a motor is: it is designed not to become an ignition source in a given zone. Here is what that imposes on the designer, the material and the documentation — and why "ATEX" is the wrong word in Canada.

Hicham M, ing., PMP
6 min
Standard

ASME PCC-2 composite repairs: what the standard authorizes — and what it does not

ASME PCC-2 is the standard most often cited to justify a composite repair on piping or pressure equipment. It is also the standard most often misunderstood: PCC-2 designs and qualifies a repair — it does not, by itself, make that repair acceptable. Here is what Part 4 actually covers, how it relates to ISO 24817, and where its authority ends.

Hicham M, P Eng, PMP
6 min
Maintenance

Flange face corrosion repair: rebuilding a sealing surface without machining or welding

A flange that leaks after a new gasket and a torque check usually has a damaged face, not a gasket problem. Crevice corrosion under the gasket, erosion at the bore and pitting from a wet stream all destroy the sealing surface. This guide explains how to inspect a flange face, the three repair options and their limits, and how a metal-filled epoxy rebuild is done in place — in a few hours, without hot work, during a shutdown or a short isolation.

Hicham M, P Eng, PMP
7 min
Compliance

API 653 composite tank repair: which findings, which repair, who decides

Under API 653, a composite repair is never the starting point: the inspection finding is. This guide maps typical findings on tank bottoms, shells, roofs and nozzles to their usual repair family, sets out when a composite repair is acceptable and who decides, and covers the file, the shutdown planning and the mistakes that turn a repair into an inspection dispute.

Hicham M, P Eng, PMP
10 min